Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond and Silk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure) Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 22:33, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond and Silk

Diamond and Silk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They fail to pass GNG. Zigzig20s (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agreed. They appear to be random bloggers who got tangential coverage. South Nashua (talk) 20:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep. There are profile pieces specifically on them in prominent and reliable news media such as Politico[1], ABC News[2], NBC News[3], Financial Times[4], and more. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per GNG. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:27, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Plot Spoiler's sources establish GNG. - Brianhe (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Received steady coverage throughout election and have continued making media appearances since[5].LM2000 (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I personally dislike Trump and his ilk, but Plot Spoiler's sources establish GNG. --Steve Foerster (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sources establish notability. Lepricavark (talk) 21:52, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep These are bonafide national social personalities and should have an article here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.91.99.141 (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Article meets WP:GNG. There is significant coverage in reliable sources that focuses on them. These are not passing mentions, but in-depth coverage of them that shows their purpose, who they are, why they do what they do. SW3 5DL (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep and Close The article meets WP:GNG requirements. And Adoil Descended (talk) 19:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.