Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond side down

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied A7. No claim of notability. Jclemens (talk) 04:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond side down (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article about a nonnotable band was just put up, but makes assertations of notability so it can't be speedied. Still, the band fails the general notability guidelines and WP:BAND. No reliable sources can be found to describe the band in detail on a google search nor on google news, let alone google scholar. There's also a pretty clear conflict of interest with the creator. Themfromspace (talk) 02:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Just because they say they are notable doesn't mean they are. Letsdrinktea (talk) 03:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agreed. Planning to release an EP and touring with other bands that aren't notable isn't enough. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.