Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diatribe from San Diego

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diatribe from San Diego

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources. Also nominating:

Anna Lincoln 11:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —MuffledThud (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete main article fails WP:BAND, no secondary sources in article, no significant coverage found online from WP:Reliable sources. MuffledThud (talk) 11:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No RS ref that I can see of note.--Epeefleche (talk) 12:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Aw, when I clicked on this I was hoping to read an actual diatribe. Well, I can't find any significant coverage; granted, you'd expect less for a band from 1985, but I really don't see anything that could support a claim to notability. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 00:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Delete all - non-notable band (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: I am going to have to concur with all the above. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.