Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Did Atari attempt to acquire Amiga?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thryduulf (talk • contribs) .

This article, by its title alone, is speculative prose that does not belong on an encyclopedia. It therefore cannot ever truly be NPOV. Bumm13 17:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. --Grafikm_fr 18:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom  Funky Monkey  (talk)  19:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Delete. Some of those facts could stand to be in the main Atari ST article. The rest, nah. RGTraynor 19:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above Trebor 20:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 04:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This article has collected information that was duplicated on both the Atari and Amiga pages. If this page is deleted, the information will be move back to the original locations, and be duplicated. A rename would be a better solution, but I don't have a better name. Val42 04:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The whole reason why I moved this article out was to avoid cluttering up the Amiga/Atari articles. If wikipedia can have information on obscure professional wrestlers and other nonsense, why not record this for history? If people think the information is untrue or speculative, I invite them to edit it. - Richardcavell 09:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete - Interesting concept but too speculative and POV for me to support. Needs sources and cleanup badly. The title should really be altered to a less speculative nature as well. I would be willing to support if these issues are addressed but not if the article remains in this state.--Cini 19:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.