Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differentia Consulting
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Differentia Consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails to meet the criteria of WP:ORG. Being one of the many Oracle or IBM partners is not sufficient for encyclopaedic notability and no independent sources show impact on the historic record. Previous PROD removed (by an account using the name of the company CEO) so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 00:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Yet another software services consulting company. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 02:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, and as spam. Can't imagine why it wasn't speedied after I tagged it as such. WuhWuzDat 17:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.