Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diffusion-barrier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. - Bobet 19:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The transwikification has been properly performed and the author information recorded at Wiktionary. (diffusion-barrier) James084 04:12, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, notable technique in metallurgy. Kappa 04:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Kappa. --Terence Ong 05:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, better off as an encyclopedia entry. Royboycrashfan 06:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless someone makes it a robust, sourced encyclopedia article before close. If so, I'd think we should lose the hyphen. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. It's not quite as stubby now, but is still unsourced, so I've added an {{unreferenced}} tag. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:33, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree that hyphen must go; it is not the common usage --DV8 2XL 20:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphen is gone. :) Royboycrashfan 23:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For sure it needs more work, I've been at it off and on and will contiue to expand - have to wait 'till I get back to work to cite my references properly --DV8 2XL 03:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, common application for electroplating. I will endeavor to expand this topic over the next few days --DV8 2XL 09:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and expandJim62sch 20:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, since people above appear to believe an article can be written about this. -- Mithent 23:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (and expand); this needs work, sure, but AfD is not an appropriate mechanism for cleanup requests. Georgewilliamherbert 03:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per DV8 2XL's recent expansion. --Karnesky 03:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.