Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigitalMania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 03:57, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DigitalMania

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

DigitalMania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimal notability other than being the first in uts own country, with little content of note. MimirIsSmart (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Tunisia. MimirIsSmart (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as there are quite a few WP:RS

DankPedia (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:56, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Blend of sources about the founder (also at AfD) and the company, but there are these sources here meet WP:ORGCRIT and then this on the founder which has company information as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:14, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Would appear to pass WP:NCORP, see also WP:NOTCLEANUP. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Sources do not establish much on notability aside from it being a first company in Tunisia. Anythig else that makes this company notable? Ramos1990 (talk) 09:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep There seem to be sufficient RSes to just barely justify inclusion. If anyone thinks differently and can provide a better rationale let me know but I think this just barely meets WP:GNG. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.