Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigitalRadioTracker (DRT)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DigitalRadioTracker (DRT)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Plenty of refs but many are simply passing mentions and others are marketing blogs etc. Nothing of substance and certainly not multiple refs from reliable and independent sources. Searches reveal more of the same. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - absolute G11. Deb (talk) 09:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - My first reaction was to say "Delete", but then when I saw how many press releases and blogs were being used as sources, I changed to "Delete with heat". Then when I saw that the company is promoting "Augmented Reality Technology" for an audio tracking algorithm, I thought "Delete with a flaming torch of anger". Then when I looked at the article's main author and got a very strong paid-editor-working-for-$10-an-hour-from-a-country-in-South-Asia vibe, I settled on "Delete with a searing hot flame thrower of purity". - AppleBsTime (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
G11 Speedy delete - Non-notable promotional article, eve if it was notable the content of the article needs a WP:TNT. Jumpytoo Talk 22:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the monitoring platform aside from a PR Newswire article. I don't know if this has any relation to the one providing data for Cashbox. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, but especially per AppleBsTime. His comment is very funny. :) GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's very promotionaly and probably not notable Spudlace (talk) 03:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.