Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Marketing Lists
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted' (has been G11'd). The Bushranger One ping only 21:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Digital Marketing Lists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Meets Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement, no source that would confirm notability (except advertisements), I cannot find any of them in Google Search neither. Alex discussion ★ 14:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Included sources from digitalmarketinglists.com, and facebook, linkedin. I don't want it to be considered as an advert, just a descripiton about the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rorczi (talk • contribs) 14:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Unreferenced article is unambiguous advertising for a business that makes no minimal claim to significance. So tagging. Digital Marketing Lists (DML) is a company... It is part of the organisation called Sales Solutions Media. DML was set up to provide a quick and efficient outlet to market and sell some of the many lists they hold. In the modern business world B2B data is rather important, thus the company is located in a flourishing sector of the market. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Unambiguous advertising, no attempt at Verifiable sources, no attempt at Notability. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.