- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Digital acting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article reads like a how-to, and I doubt it could really become much else. - furrykef (Talk at me) 19:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I actually see a number of references to this phrase in various CGI industry spots with a quick search, but I'm not entirely sure this could be expanded out of 'definition' territory any time soon. Weak delete Tony Fox (arf!) 20:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 23:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Can't be salvaged as is. DreamGuy 08:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a how-to with OR issues as well. Lankiveil 10:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per above Tim.bounceback(review me! | talk | contribs | ubxen) 13:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above commentsCorpx 13:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Per above. ~ Magnus animuM Brain Freeze! 20:21, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not much real information here, just a lot of generalizations. --Infrangible 01:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Description of a technique animators have used as far back as Walt Disney's first studio, and likely covered elsewhere. MDonfield 13:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.