Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital innovation
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:50, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Digital innovation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I searched on Google News for sources about this neologism. Although there were quite a few articles that used the term, none of them discussed it in a significant manner. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It looks to be a fairly self-explanatory term, unless one mistakes it for referring to a new improved finger (with Vitamin G24). I can't see an article being necessary to define it. I removed some text from the creator's talk page that appeared to be promoting a blog on this subject, so prehaps this is an attempt to promote the term - especially as the blog used the same name as the creator. The blog hasn't appeared in the article in question here, by the way. Peridon (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unsourced, largely vacuous; nothing particularly new here. Hairhorn (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable neologism Spatulli (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.