Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digitally Imported (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Digitally Imported (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Although this site has supposedly been around since 1999, there is almost nothing in the way of independent sources to verify its notability, as per WP:RS standards. Most of the links in the reference section of the article circle back to the site itself. May also fail WP:WEB for similar reasons. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The page is an advert. also appears to have WP:COI issues. Semitransgenic (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete at present appears to non-notable and fail WP:V due to lack of 3rd party reliable sources. Oh and because I'm a bit of an idiot is there a way to show that the original deletion was overturned and link to whatever discussion occured to overturn it for clarity's sakee? Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.