Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitri Udovicki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The articles in question are found to lack the required notability for inclusion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitri Udovicki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, sourced entirely to primary sources except for a video interview with him on YouTube, of a film director whose only discernible claim of notability is having won the Best Director award at a non-notable film festival, which is not a compelling WP:CREATIVE pass -- and a spinoff article about his film, which makes and sources no claim of notability whatsoever under WP:NFILM. As always, neither a director nor a film is automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because they exist -- reliable source coverage, supporting a proper claim of notability, must be present for them to earn one. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete articles lacks sources to pass GNG and makes no actual claim to notability, having his film win an award at a non-notable film festival is not enough to make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing at all convincing of the needed notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage about either him or his film to show that either of them meet WP:GNG. Pinging both Johnpacklambert and SwisterTwister, who appear to only be commenting on the director, and not also on the film. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.