Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Direct Access Democracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Avi 05:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nn neologism. Probably ought to have been nominated at the same time as Direct Access Democracy Canada, which is currently nominated on its own AfD. Google results of the phrase are usually to mirrors of wikipedia, blog and chat board entries, and link repositories. Agent 86 06:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NEO. Not a lot of Google results [1]--TBCTaLk?!? 06:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I was going to nominate this along with the above-mentioned DADC, but forgot as i was going to do one last check for any other independent usage of the term (doesn't seem to be). The current article seems to be solely referring to the non-notable usage at "etches.net". - David Oberst 06:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat talk 09:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:NEO is only a guideline, but WP:NOT is policy. See definition #1. Ste4k 16:03, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it seems to be a neologism invented by a particular party. - Richardcavell 23:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.