- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Directi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company fails to meet WP:CORP, is non-notable, and should be deleted. Me-123567-Me (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This company is notable as the first ICANN-accredited registrar in India. Inniverse (talk) 13:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I have sourced the article now. It meets WP:GNG through coverage in indian mainstream newspapers and magazines (business, technical, general - company has got coverage in all sorts of media). Just click the Gnews link about.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Quite notable in India. Sodabottle has already added references. utcursch | talk 14:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.