Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Directory Report
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Directory Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
One of many articles posted by User:Egasa in an apparent astroturfing campaign. Barest assertion of notability, and no secondary independent sources to back up any of these claims. DarkAudit (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable MBisanz talk 05:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Spam, minor trade publication, not notable. PKT (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, WP:Spam, WP:Notability.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 15:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or speedy: A3, A1, A7 speedy delete criteria, plus it's pretty spammy. Utgard Loki (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete WP:SPAM Doc Strange (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G11 spam and so tagged —Travistalk 02:56, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.