- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dirk Colaert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced content and I'm not sure that it passes being notable, plus it hasn't been touched since the creation of the article. [1] Linked to evidence. HairyPerry 18:22, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sounds like he's done some spiffy stuff, but I see nothing that would fulfill WP:Notability (people). -Verdatum (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the above comment by Verdatum. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 05:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Let us find a consensus on this! (And delete!!!) JBsupreme (talk) 06:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--JB, here's my consent. There is no notability here, just a sort of a resume. Drmies (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.