Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disclosure Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Steven M. Greer. MBisanz talk 19:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Disclosure Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject is not the subject of substantial coverage by reliable sources and fails WP:GNG. WP:CORPDEPTH is also very lacking, other than what's available on Steven M. Greer. The one press conference appears not to meet WP:1E. JFHJr (㊟) 03:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteMerge:Unable to find reliable sources which establishes the notability of the article. Nothing within the article itself suggests otherwise. Tiggerjay (talk) 05:59, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Upon future reflection, I would agree with Kitfoxxe that merging into Steven M. Greer would probably be better suited unless a reliable source can be found to establish notability of the Disclosure Project. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Merge/Redirect to Steven M. Greer. It's his project. He seems to be notable enough, given the sources for his article.Kitfoxxe (talk) 06:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Keep This is a notable topic in UFOlogy which is not solely limited to Steven M. Greer, but I'm not aware of any reliable sources that discuss the word is used by others besides him. Google Scholar only turns up advocates and a CSICOP article about various kinds of conspiracy theories. Shii (tock) 03:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.