Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disconnection in Scientology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily redirected, no further action required. Just zis Guy you know? 20:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly created this article in an attempt to organize the topic. It is a copy of a better established page, disconnection, and if there is ambiguity, a better page would be the existing disconnection (scientology) page. I apologize for the tedium of this request; I am a newbie and I'm just becoming familiar with the process. I think this arcticle should be a speedy deletion. Bantab 18:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment You could have just made it a redirect. Dp462090 | Talk | Contrib | 18:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I've been bold and redirected it to Disconnection. Go ahead and revert back if you want, but I think it might be a valid search term, and at any rate redirects are cheap. BryanG 18:42, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Put {{db-author}} in the article if you are the only one that has contributed to it and you want it speedy deleted. Redirect also seems dandy in this case. Kotepho 19:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.