Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discryptor (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 13:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discryptor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable software - article created purely to promote this commercial software product. Previously nominated via afd and deleted as spam. Further, this article is also confusingly named, as it's practically identical to DiskCryptor - a legitimate article with information on an open source program. Cupids wings (talk) 18:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I cannot find any notability, and it is unlikely that it has become notable since its last deletion. While there are plenty of Google hits, they are all for generic download sites. Haakon (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -not notable. The article has whole sections on different cyphers, which would be best moved (if they actually had any useful content not already present) to the relevant block cypher page - which would have the effect of reducing the Discryptor page to practically nothing. Nuwewsco (talk) 08:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Spam article with no actual content that couldn't be moved to a more appropriate place XFireRaidX (talk) 19:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.