Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discworld: Ankh-Morpork
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Notability has been addressed through the discovered sources. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 05:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Discworld: Ankh-Morpork (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per WP:N FunkyCanute (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as it has significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources: Wired and Bit Gamer. Also found multiple reviews at other sites: [1], [2], and [3]. —Torchiest talkedits 18:40, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article requires some extensive work to meet our standards, but there are a number of reviews for this game from reliable sources, particularly the ones from Wired and Bit Gamer brought up by Torchiest, that show that it is notable enough, as far as board games go. Rorshacma (talk) 23:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per Wired and other refs. Celtechm (talk) 00:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Also has coverage on websites of MTV[4] and SFX magazine[5]. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.