- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 09:03, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pure dicdef, neologism. ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 18:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Arrange Quite a few interesting entries in Google, but the article should be done better. (unsigned vote by Special:Contributions/212.56.128.185
- Still dicdef though. ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 18:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
transwikito wikitionary if they want it. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 19:07, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I really think an article on Disneyfication belongs here, although I'm not sure this is it. I'd love to see a rewrite, because I think it's an important concept. Joyous (talk) 19:15, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- More comment: We have an article called Disneyization, which seems to be the same concept. However, I think "disneyfication" is the more common term. Joyous (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment yea I agree - that should be merged with this article and this one should be expanded. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 20:00, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I have attempted a rewrite of the article, although I haven't yet done a merge with disneyization. How does it look for starters? Joyous (talk) 21:16, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It’s an interesting idea and worthy of discussion. I would like to see this expanded. Joyous did a good job for starters. ♠ DanMS 23:07, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, expand, merge in Disneyization, less common term for the same phenomenon. -- BD2412 talk 00:30, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and do as BD2412 says. Vizjim 01:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I have notice a lack of articles in Wikipedia on urban planning, and specifically dealing with Placelessness (it gets 33,000 google hits;15,000 relevant - but 5 Wikipedia hits; 1 relevant). This article can help fill the void. --maclean25 01:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Thanks to Joy for the rewrite. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 20:04, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- 'keep now that it is rewritten it is ok Yuckfoo 21:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.