Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DispcalGUI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DispcalGUI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing to show notability. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no 3rd party refs to establish notability of this software.Dialectric (talk) 01:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 05:49, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NOTABLE. --Tomtomn00 (talk • contributions) 17:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete no in-depth coverage to indicate WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 10:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.