Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disruptor (spam blocking Outlook plugin)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptor (spam blocking Outlook plugin)

Contested speedy, then prod. The software described is not notable. The article does little or nothing to assert its notability, and the article is largely written like an advertisement. Few relevant Google hits that aren't ads or Wikipedia/reflectors. Realkyhick 02:20, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Plenty of ghits for downloads, but this does't make it notable. It doesn't do anything different or new to deserve an article. Nicko (Talk•Contribs)Review my progress! 02:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete Those which follow historically don't do anything different. This was the first to do it so it needs its own article. Parlanced 02:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==non-notability contested== fix header so it won't disrupt things Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 02:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC) reference to: printed technology magazine[reply]

additionally it is a first-in-kind use of Microsoft's COM add-in technology.

Parlanced 02:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'd fix the entry above if I could make heads or tails of it. Realkyhick 02:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

being the first of a kind thing makes it deserving of an article doesn't it? apologies for the garish formatting. I wasn't trying to be an attention whore. I assumed that was the right style. Parlanced 03:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"First of its kind" is by no means a criteria for notability, particularly not the sole criteria. Realkyhick 13:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete is an advertisment. Oyster guitarist 03:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 06:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete reads like an advertisement and no "significant coverage" of this plugin Corpx 15:25, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.