Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divorce in Washington State

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 21:59, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT a howto. — brighterorange (talk) 02:46, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above.--KJPurscell 04:55, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Joaquin Murietta 07:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Alhutch 18:58, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, but there must be an article on divorce law in the US that I can't manage to find: it could be redir/merged there as appropriate. -Splash^talk 21:02, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• PETITION FOR DELETION asforewith hereuntoith previously stated, noteworthy content herein contained in Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia (hencefore referred to as Wikipedia), please reference WP:NOT Section 1 Subsection 10 Paragraph 1 explicitly and implicity states "While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places, and things, Wikipedia articles should not include instruction - advice (legal, medical, or otherwise), suggestions, or contain "how-to"s. This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, and recipes. Wikibooks is a Wikipedia sister-project which is better suited for such things." As per said referenced text, this article is in violation of said rules, on the grounds of providing legal advise and should deleted presently. Roodog2k (talk) 21:21, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 23:56, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm glad to learn how to divorce someone in my own state, but still useless. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:53, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• SUMMONS I hereby summons an admin to close this AfD. They will be given 96 hours time. You have been served. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:53, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.