Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do It for Johnny
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Do It for Johnny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not seeing any significant independent coverage of this -- at all. It would appear to fall well short of our minimum standards for film notability. Am I missing something? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete. My first thought was the line from The Outsiders. I'm unable to find any coverage on this documentary. Gong show 00:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Weak keep. In diligent searches, I found its production spoken about in depth in a few sources. It just barely pushes at WP:NF. Schmidt, Michael Q. 02:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep (changed from above) per MQS, whose additions appear to be just enough to put this topic over the bar. Kudos, Michael. Gong show 16:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with the above comments that the sources added by MQS establish enough notability to warrant inclusion. It's not a major motion picture, but it was a significant documentary that was noted on substantially inr eliable independent sources. Keep. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.