Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Docketing software
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 03:11, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This article was transwikied to wiktionary in April 2005. Since then it hasn't evolved at all. It will probably never evolve into a decent wikipedia article. I vote delete. --Edcolins 10:24, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Three months is far too short a time for a stub to develop (typically this takes more than six months). The article also suffers from insufficient linking and cats. As a plant needs roots, so an article needs links. I am adding some suitable cats and a stub template. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 18:22, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable subject, definitely worthy of an EnWiki article. Fernando Rizo 21:27, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable. Especially in light of recent malpractice cases involving law firms that weren't using any software[1]. That article would also be a good place to start to expand that stub. LexisOne also has a list[2].
- Keep and expand. Notable topic. JamesBurns 03:53, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.