Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DocuLex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:36, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DocuLex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software company with insufficient coverage. The article has four references. Two are dead links, the other two appear to be 2009 press releases. Furthermore, two years ago the company was bought by DocSTAR which has it's own article, and that article doesn't even mention DocuLex. MB (talk) 01:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The ecmconnection reference is available at the Wayback machine. Looks like a press release. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 04:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 11:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 11:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this is actually convincing of better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there's proof of notability, I haven't found it. As an aside, the article doesn't really say much, anyway (perhaps because there are no good sources). --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.