Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domain7 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Domain7

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Domain7
• Articles for deletion/Domain7 (2nd nomination)

Domain7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resubmitting this article to AfD. Previous nomination generated no discussion. Article subject is not notable. A Google search turned up multiple pages of promotional hits. Asserted awards are trivial. Sources fail WP:RS. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, and fails WP:CORP. YSSYguy (talk) 01:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No substantial coverage from reliable sources. WP:NOTPROMOTION. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.