- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was transwiki. Johnleemk | Talk 15:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rubbish, unencyclopedic, vanity. Delete Ardenn 05:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC) Transwiki --Ardenn 03:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. Term is used in an article in Business 2.0 (Dec. 2005). Among other places. Crypticfirefly 07:09, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a real term used in the ___domain business. The definition is accurate and not self interested at all. -Unsigned comment from 70.104.175.24.
- I can not beleive anybody would try to strike an accurate entry such as this from Wikipedia. This simple example illustrates the weakness of search engine's and central repositories of info.. they can be undermined by special interests. Oh well, better get a ___domain name and publish the truth myself. -Unsigned comment from 63.130.192.13
- Positively ridiculous. Google this term and see how many listings appear. Deletion requests such as this undermine the spirit of Wikipedia. What a pity. -Unsigned comment from 63.130.192.13
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.