- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was article speedily deleted by User:INeverCry under criterion A1. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 13:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dontcopy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Personal essay-type page. We already have Plagiarism. PlanetEditor (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unencyclopedic content, more like a blog post expressing personal opinion. Probably eligible for speedy deletion under some criterion, if you can work out what it's actually about, maybe "A1 No context" or "A10 Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic". It's certainly not clear what the subject is - is Dontcopy some kind of organisation or movement or principle or is it just about plagiarism? --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Colapeninsula. Unsourced mini-essay with a vague assertion about something somebody said, nothing comes up when I search his name either. Can't quite fit this into a CSD category, but can see no reason for it to stay here. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:ESSAY although is probably just a sandbox DavidTTTaylor (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.