Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dontnod Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dontnod Entertainment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a recreation of one previously deleted via PROD. Subject fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Coverage is of the purely routine and trivial sort, mostly short blurbs from an online gaming news site. Some of the cited sources deal more or less exclusively with the two games produced by the company that garnered any reviews (mixed). A Google did not yield anything that rings the Notability bell. The bottom line: It's a company, one of millions, with no credible claim to encyclopedic notability. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 17:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the following sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and a little here [7]. Sam Walton (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Added these sources/content to the article. Sam Walton (talk) 00:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sam Walton's sources, which are reliable, discuss the subject in detail, and yes, address the company itself, not just the games it makes. Sergecross73 msg me 21:28, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing AfD nom based on added sources. HT: Sam Walton. Suggest speedy close. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.