- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Proto::type 14:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article does note meet the Wikipedia:Companies,_corporations_and_economic_information/Notability_and_inclusion_guidelines#Criteria_for_companies_and_corporations criteria for inclusion. meatclerk 23:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Rather popular in Germany. Dr Zak 23:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I see that you are onr of the editors - why is it still without sufficient notanility? BlueValour 02:54, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- NO Vote Conflict of Interest. I nominate. This article has had over 1 year with a cleanup tag. No major or substantial improvements have been made. There is no encycolpedic form. Most likely written from the Corp. office. Regardless of the nature of the website, this article deserves to be deleted. --meatclerk 23:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia requires that we Assume Good faith as per WP:AGF so we should avoid the assumption that it's most likely this is written from the "Corp Office"
- Secondly the person who nominated the article for deletion cannot vote on it Supposed 18:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The person who nominates the article is presumed to vote delete unless it's a procedural nomination, and cannot "vote" again. S/he may add additional comments as appropriate. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep A notable website and company as per WP:N who's article I have little doubt will meet WP:CORP criteria
when links are added. Supposed 18:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I see that you have already edited the article - if there are links to be made surely you would have made them? BlueValour 02:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless evidence of WP:CORP is included in the article. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Alexa rating of 301,897 means it's nowhere. NN. BlueValour 02:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article does not assert notabilty that would satisfy any of the various criteria listed under WP:CORP or WP:WEB. --Satori Son 03:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CORP, WP:WEB and WP:NOTE (which is the head policy for the other two). Similar thing occuring at the AfD for GraalOnline. Killfest2—Daniel.Bryant 10:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.