Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DosWin32

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to DOS extender. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DosWin32

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for more than a year (although the article was in pretty much identical state back in 2010). Google Books search gives one hit, a bare mention (other hits are about Novell software, which seems to be unrelated). No evidence of notability, it seems. — Keφr 16:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to DOS extender or delete. Already mentioned there, and it doesn't need its own article. I can't find any mention of it in reliable sources. However, it seems to be of Russian origin, which probably complicates things. Maybe someone can find Russian-language sources, but I kind of doubt it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to DOS extender. I'm finding several passing mentions (mostly in NetWare documentation) but there's not enough out there on which to hang an article. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to DOS extender - lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.