Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dots for Days

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:34, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dots for Days

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable game created by COI. We really need Speedy for these things... Gaijin42 (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. The article contain no sources at all, and the app game was released just two weeks ago, so we're not going to find any yet. If it turns out to be another Angry Birds then we can write the article once it is notable. Meters (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Article creator now blocked as a promotional account. Meters (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'd previously nominated the article for speedy deletion and someone else removed the tag.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:25, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. There's just no sourcing. In any case, speedy doesn't really apply here since it's not so promotional that it'd be irredeemable and A7 wouldn't apply because it's not an online game. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.