- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 03:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Douglas Vinter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
See WP:BLP1E. This person has no historical significance warranting an article, nor are there any truly biographical sources (where he, rather than the one event he gained notoriety for, is the subject of the source). Wikipedia shouldn't be a publisher of true crime accounts. He committed a murder that was briefly the subject of news reports, and that is all. However, Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Delete. Dominic·t 02:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - sadly, nothing notable about a double murderer. An appeal is not per se notable either. Bearian (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - notability not established. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Coverage is not significant. Location (talk) 02:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.