- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Downstream OS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreleased OS of unclear notability. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: IMO notability of yet to be release Linux distribution is pretty clear: none. Still, this is of small relevance, as the topic is excluded per WP:CRYSTAL. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seriously? This needs another 7 days for more discussion? Unreleased, vaguely scheduled Linux distro produced in a "home lab" (I'm guessing the proper term is "bedroom") by some guy named Franco, built in SUSE Studio (which lets anyone "develop their own Linux OS" by choosing which packages they want included), the only source -- and that's using a very loose definition of the word "source" -- for which is a Kickstarter-type site page created by Franco looking for project funding that currently has precisely 0 backers. Obvious, and preferably a sped-up, delete. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 14:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Just because I think this is hilarious, I note that SUSE Studio's site boasts that 6099 builds have been created this week. This was one of the builds that was produced last week, apparently. Or not, as it's not finished. :D ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 17:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nonnotable, as above. No Reliable sources. Dialectric (talk) 14:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.