Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. ajay prakash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. ajay prakash

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Dr. ajay prakash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, minor politician (not a member of an assembly, but a member of party committees only, as far as I can tell) Fram (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Fram (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nomination. Fails WP:NPOL. --Baggaet (talk) 09:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete A7.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra (talk • contribs) 13:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete He co-owns a massage clinic or something of the sort. Non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• SpeedySnow Delete per WP:AVALANCHE. Per nom. and WP:A7., thoroughly fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 14:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• delete fails WP:NPOL, as well as WP:GNG. Let the AfD run its course for posterity — WP:G4. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:NPOL as unelected politician article. Promoting the subject. Venkat TL (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Absolutely nothing stated here is an "inherent" notability claim that would guarantee him automatic inclusion in Wikipedia, and absolutely none of the sourcing is WP:GNG-worthy media coverage that would build a case for his passage of any of our conditional inclusion tests either. Bearcat (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails both WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.