Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Bhanu Pratap Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus. DGG ( talk ) 18:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Bhanu Pratap Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a difficult article to parse since it doesn't meet layout guidelines, but the general sense is that this is a fellow who has won a few awards and has a large stamp/coin collection. I'm not sure that makes him notable. It's a bit difficult to sift through Google News since there are other individuals with this same name who are more prominent. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While the article makes lots of claims about the Singh, they are either unverified, or in the case of the ones like "creating the world's largest envelope" while it is verified with a link to Guiness, we lack secondary coverage to show that anyone really cares that he did such a thing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

you can see links I gave about Dr SInghs claim of making world's largest envelop as its verified by many record books specially GUINNESS BOOK POF WORLD REORDS a=which is an independent authority with its strict rules and clauses to gave /verify anyone's claim similarly there are links of Many websites about Dr Singh plz see and verify it

if you want to verify these claims I can produce all certificates , plz send the email address where I have to send these certificates, DR Singhs achievements are published in many newspaper of India and I mentioned all the references . plz see all and decide about the deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anu214 (talk • contribs) 06:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks[reply]

http://drbhanupratapsingh.com/

- This Page is very Informative an Coverting a re-known figure of Chhattisgarh State of INDIA,Dr Bhanu Pratap Singhis A well Known personality and figure of Raipur,Chhattisgarh , he is Famous For His collection ,knowledge and social works.

I attended his seminars,variour volunary blood camps and found that he is devote for these social works for betterment of Poor People. He is a regular feature in local news paper as well as national news paper like times of India ect. or his entry in Guiness Book Of world Records He is Ony Person Of our States (May be of Inda) who Has So many guinness Records.

Article on him in wikepedia will guide many for the noble hobby of stamps coins and paper mney collection as well increase peoples interest to take part in social works Thats why I am Favouring For publishing of Article On HIM in Wikipedia..

Respected sir i think the page of Dr bhanu Pratap Singh Ji Must Be There On Wikipedia as he is good public figure everybody knows in chhattisgarh which is a state in INDIA He Also been a part of A movie Named As Mantostaan In which he is creativity producer and iven any indian thoughts of mahatama gandhi ji and jawaharla nehru ji and the movie was been selected in cannes marche du film in year 2016 and one more thing i will like to tell about bhanu ji he is president to asia in noble order for human excellency which main office is in brazil and doing human rights works in india and other countries too and i can say tha he is having more then 100 national award and more then 20 international award sir this is my request to see to the discussion and a page of dr bhanu ji must be created on wikipedia we are eagerly waiting and hope for the possitive responce from wikipedia.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.172.194.2 (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

D_MA_A_I_H_C_and_A_MBA_Hosp._Adm_LLB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anu214 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Johnpacklambert, Guiness is certainly independent of Bhanu Pratap Singh, and so whether the record is reported by anyone else seems irrelevant when it comes notability concerns or any other deletion issue. It may or may not be a content issue (whether "anyone really cares that he did such a thing" and consequentially should we mention it) but we are here to discuss inclusion of the article, not its content. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: When I look for sources there is plenty of unusable social media. However I do see some newspaper coverage [1] and other stuff that is just passing mentions. If Anu214 is correct about newspaper coverage then notability of this person is shown. Note that there have been 3 earlier speedy deletions of what is probably an autobiography by a user DRBPSINGH1961. However the current page is better in that it includes some references, is not just a pure CV, and has significant content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:38, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete, db-spam. Hairhorn (talk) 04:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is so badly written that it is hard to separate out notability, fluff and just poor formatting and grammar. Guinness world records(or the two other record recording organizations cited) by themselves do not confer notability since in many cases it is nothing but finding some obscure thing that no one else wants to do and neither does martial hall of fame awards from non-notable organizations. By the breathless nature of the prose one can't help the feeling that a wikipedia page is just part of the collection. The article itself was declined during the AfC process but just copy pasted over Peter Rehse (talk) 11:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore notability isn't granted by association by a famous relative per WP:INVALIDBIO, it isn't much a stretch to say that this person isn't notable just because they own something in the Guinness Book of World Records. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I took some time to format the article so that it might be possible to find indications of notability. There are many claims of minor notability here, but there is no significant coverage in reliable sources that supports this person's notability. Yes, it appears that he has some "records" for trivial accomplishments that no doubt represent some effort on his part, but without coverage in reliable sources, we can't have an article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jonesey95 for the editing the article, its very helpful for me, All are concerned about the Records, Just read all the content m DR Singh did 2 PhDs on Numismatics due to his interest in Coins, he did his PhD on new area that is Study of Coin issued by Local rulers of Chhattisgarh and coins of Naga Kings of PAdmavati . Both areas are new in relation to Knowledge and study about these coinages. At present he is also doing his D Lit in Coinages of Kalachuri Kings of South Kosala( Present Chhattisgarh) from 900AD -1500 AD) he has a good collection of these coins also, his articles on Coins are published in many Journals . Apart from this, he is also producer of Two films one of which { Mantostaan ) was screened at cannes International Film Festival, Sanfrancisco Film Festival, Melbourne film Festival, In Goa Int Film Festival in 2016. Also selected for London Asian Film festival 2017. what else you want to prove notability about a person?

There are many pages of various actors , some social workers with very little work in comparison to Dr Singh's work . All I am doing is just to appreciate his work and to make pageof a person who is doing these works from his own Pocket. regarding mistakes in grammar, style, cohesion tone and spelling , Its my fault as I am new in This field and trying to make this page about Dr Singh, SO need help from all the volunteers like Mr Jonesey95, who improved the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anu214 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.