- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable band, doesn't meet WP:MUSIC criteria and a possible hoax as it appears to be entirely a puff piece about the band. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 09:39, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Definitely not a hoax - the CD exists and releasing label appears to be a fairly large independent with a decent catalogue. That said, the copyright notice at the end indicates a possible copyvio and there is no citation for claims of their influence. Ac@osr 11:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:MUSIC. --Eivindt@c 15:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Heavily POV, no assertion of notability, no reason to keep the article. -- Kicking222 15:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Newyorktimescrossword 02:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no googles. vanity. : ( Lonesomedovechocolate 00:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.