Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft:Glycintennial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close as the page is a draft, not an article. (non-admin closure) — Bilorv (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Draft:Glycintennial

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page doesn't seem to be neutral, doesn't meet the criteria for significance, and feels very much like an advertisement. It doesn't meet the criteria for CSD. cliffsteinman -- Discuss 23:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. cliffsteinman -- Discuss 23:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest procedural close as misplaced. Draftspace articles should be taken to WP:MFD instead. --Finngall ^talk 23:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.