- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close as wrong venue. Drafts to be nominated for deletion go to WP:MFD, not AfD. Draft has already been rightly rejected for acceptance in mainspace. (non-admin closure) --Finngall talk 20:11, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Draft:Queenly (edit | [[Talk:Draft:Queenly|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
seems like promotional content, especially considering the creator of the article being "Queenlyapp" DirkJandeGeer (щи) 19:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 6. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.