Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dramamine pathway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Was tagged {{db-g3}}. Hoax, nonsense, and claimed original research on talk. Delete, including the image. Lupo 11:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• I was about to speedy delete it. Don't AfD obvious G3 (look at the image). Rd232 ^talk 11:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Last time I looked, even obvious hoaxes were not candidates for speedy deletion. If that has changed, all the better, but then make it clear on WP:CSD. G3 refers to vandalism, and while I do agree that hoaxes are a form of vandalism, I was under the impression that the general consensus was that hoaxes should not be speedied but brought to WP:AFD. Lupo 13:11, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per above. PJM 12:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unless good, easily verifiable source citations are presented prior to expiration of AfD discussion. Reads like an obvious hoax or joke, particularly the illustration. If it isn't, the onus is on the contributor to provide citations. No Google hits on exact phrase "Dramamine pathway". I have no objection at all to speedy deleting as vandalism, and if speedied and sources are subsequently provided I'll gladly take it to deletion review myself. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:25, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.