Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drawing room play

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing room play (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The concept is referenced in a book published by English Heritage, a government agency. --Eastmain (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It provides a reliable source and does appear to be notable as a type of play. A Google search gives online sources from Google books, mentions on Time magazine's website, an article in the New York Times on a drawing room play and so on.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: You can find mentions of the concept, or at least prototypes of it, in annotations of Jane Austen's novels. Definitely notable and capable of expansion into encyclopedic coverage. I'd be surprised if there aren't dissertations on the subject, given the sheer volume of stuff written on Victorian domestic culture. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.