- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep, article has decent citations. (closed by non-admin) RMHED (talk) 19:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dready (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable creation; if the creator isn't notable enough to be included the character definitely isn't. Ironholds (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments: 1) Given the large holes in wikicoverage of creative professionals outside of North America, arguing non-notability from not having an article is dubious logic at best. 2) There's no AfD notice on the article. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question to nominator: Could you explain how, in your opinion, having four independent, third-party sources discussing the work and its importance doesn't demonstrate notability? —Quasirandom (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - The subject of the article (dready doodle) has received coverage in sources which are independent of the subject. The notability of the creator of doodle is not really relevant! Nk.sheridan Talk 21:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I've placed an AfD tag on the article as the nom did not. Nk.sheridan Talk 22:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the nominator hasn't cleared up any suspicions he/she might have with the sources, keep: multiple third-party notices of something is nobility. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.