- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dromite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable monster from the Dungeons & Dragons universe. There are no third party sources. May be a little more notable than I am aware, as I don't play Psionics, but this article does not indicate that it is. J Milburn (talk) 13:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - minor monster at best. Web Warlock (talk) 17:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - obscure monster. maybe add it to its source book Expanded_Psionics_Handbook with any other races present in the book such as the classes are listed there, and redirect from here to there. shadzar|Talk|contribs 17:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn monster. If anything, should be added to its sourcebook, as it is a legitimate race there. -Jéské (v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing) 18:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not every D&D creature is notable. Very few are, actually. This is no slaad or death knight, so away it goes. (I'm going to copy-paste this into all of the D&D creature AfD's going on right now. Couldn't we have combined them for ease?) --Ig8887 (talk) 03:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Web Warlock. Include in a list (sans-link). Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.