- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dropa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Von Daniken fringe theory that has received absolutely ZERO independent third-party notice. Any meaningful content can be merged with Erich von Däniken. However, I can't find anything in the article worth keeping. ScienceApologist (talk) 18:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I do not see any scholarly reference on this topic. If search for Erich von Däniken + Dropa, google search in ___domain edu. returns only 4 ghits [1]. Scholar shows no ghit [2]. Non-notable fringe rubbish invented by a notable fringe theorist. Merge any useful information into Erich von Däniken. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: - I've worked on this article, but upon reflection, it really doesn't seem to belong on Wikipedia. ClovisPt (talk) 21:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.