- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 08:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article consists of two related dicdefs and belongs at wiktionary Vicarious 21:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Valid article on a valid subject that could be expanded. 1ne 22:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Transwiki to Wiktionary if it ain't there already.Keep - changed my mind, it could stay on its own as an article if improved. Unfortunately, I was way too late for the hippie era (I'm only 20) so I can't help this one. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Actions • Words))) 23:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Keep Currently dicdef, but definitely a topic deserving an article citing trends, reasons, etc. for "dropping out." --Auto(talk / contribs) 23:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Autocracy. I'm surprised there's not already a decent article on this. --Galaxiaad 01:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as well. It's the kind of social concept I'd expect to see an article on; it just has zilch content. It could be a decent article if it gets some attention (maybe tag it with some appropriate template?). –Pakman044 08:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete origional research and dictionary definition--Sefringle 05:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.