Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drowning Fish (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Drowning Fish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. This article has been here for three years with no improvements to indicate notability. The article was deleted once before. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability; and no indication that any of the [[WP:BAND] criteria are met. -- Whpq (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only sources are primary, and no evidence supporting WP:BAND per above. Article creator was surprisingly cool about having his page deleted in the first nomination. Too bad it didn't get any improvement since then. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I'm pretty sure that the first AFD is for a different band of the same name. -- Whpq (talk) 19:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.