Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drunkard's search

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drunkard's search

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this article will struggle to improve from its current 3 lines of text Brad7777 (talk) 02:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Over a hundred google scholar hits establish notability. Sławomir Biały (talk) 03:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Click the handy link already supplied and page a bit. No question. EEng (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be a notable concept with some longevity, as it was apparently the title of a 1968 book. I'm also not convinced this isn't expandable, as the article explains it's a concept in social sciences but doesn't elaborate, there's definitely room for more there. Transwiki to wikitionary might be another possibility. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sławomir Biały; also nomination reason is invalid. -- 202.124.73.2 (talk) 11:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.